

The second reason why I hate is the fact that their product, this so-called “Originality Report,” produces nothing of value. Since my work is now going to be floating around the internet and undoubtedly appearing in countless other “Originality Reports,” I figured that I should at least try to get some of the credit.

You can also link directly to the PDF here. To combat this loss of control, I have uploaded my first submission, “Data Modeling – Conceive, Collaborate, Create,” to my portfolio page. can now use my paper as an ongoing reference to check any future submissions. To begin, by submitting my work to, I am resigning any control over the electronic copy of the work that I have just created. There are several reasons why I despise this practice and especially hate. We are then expected to make changes to our original assignment that will increase our “Originality Score,” resubmit the paper to, and then re-generate our originality report which, ideally, is more original than our first submission. The Originality Report is basically a fancy marketing term for when the service searches the text of your submission and matches it with various other sources across the web, ostensibly to prevent blatant plagiarism. The purpose of doing this is to generate an “Originality Report” that is turned in along with our assignments.

I am currently taking a class where the instructor requires us to upload our assignments to.
